I've never knew an teenage or an adult couple who knew each other since they were small children.

In high school I was skinny quiet and a semi nerd. Been hitting the gym five days a week since the end of senior year. I'm thinking of sliding in some of my high school crushes DM's. They used to be above my level but things changed.

This girl I'm talking to found out I was married and she gave me chances to tell her but I never did and she finally told me on day 5 if us knowingly eachother we've hung out everyday since we met and she started to really like me she said but she can't be with married man. I told her our situation how we love eachother but we just are a open relationship and interested in bringing a 2nd women into the middle of it and she still said she just want to be friends now and no sex or anything. Now I know this means okay then just be friends but is it likely she means to just not hangout anymore or does she still want to explore the ideas of possibly making it work? I feel like if she was done she wouldn't have kept texting me.

I'm talking fantasy dreams like you are walking home all stressed and some very attractive young female in the dream suddenly takes you by surprise and says "I feel like I've known you for 20 years" and the feeling is mutual and though it's all a fantasy dream no real person When you wake up to "get the f—— out of bed can't you hear the 2 year old is crying !!!!??? Is this a form of subconscious cheating?

We've been broken up for months. I texted him that I missed him and he went on and wrote essays about how I hurt him etc it's been months but he was saying how I didn't apologize in a timely manner and allowed him to suffer.i said things happened and were said that shouldnt have. Then he went on to say how do you suppose things would workout now? How do you undo what was done etc I said better than the first time since experienced makes one better. He went on to say that he's spent the time bettering himself etc and that he didn't want to put himself in a situation that would hurt him again. I said I didn't want a relationship that would cause pain either and that I never meant to hurt him. He didn't respond I asked what are you doing. He replied a couple hours later that he was asleep. The following day we had a conversation I said it was hot and he asked if I had an ac, if I have a window in my bedroom to install an ac unit etc. Couple days passed and I got a bit annoyed that he didn't text and thought maybe he was waiting for me and I was leaving the country. I said you despite all that I gave you the benefit of the doubt. It realized to no end. I say I miss you but you're still stuck in the past bitnerrness and resentment. He replied ok. I'm not going to argue with you. Enjoy your trip I didn't reply.

I am getting weary of the people who attempt to minimize the issue by citing this report. "The report determined that, during the period from 1950 to 2002, a total of 10,667 individuals had made allegations of child sexual abuse. Of these, the dioceses had been able to identify 6,700 unique accusations against 4,392 clergy over that period in the USA, which is about 4 per cent of all 109,694 ordained clergy i.e. priests or deacons or members of religious orders, active in the USA during the time covered by the study. [2] Roughly 4 per cent of them were accused." My first point: The report was released in 2004, which was 14 YEARS AGO!! I would bet money that in the past 14 years, there have thousands more clergy pedophilia incidents worldwide that have been covered up. So that 4 per cent estimate is meaningless today. I am sure it would be much higher now, in 2018. My second point: The 4 per cent of priests who had allegations against them were the ones whose victims bravely came forward. This 4 per cent represents only the priests who got caught. Many victims are not strong enough to accuse their abusers. I'm sure there are many more pedophile priests still active in the church who haven't yet been accused. My third point: This report was BASED ONLY ON U.S. statistics. Pedophile priests have preyed on victims in many other countries, so the 4 per cent again is meaningless, when talking about the Catholic church as a whole.